Analysis Report for R4455 ($10NOV04XE) (Analyzed by Sergei Bolotin, GSFC Analysis Center. Spoolfile source: unknown.) Problems: baselines with HOBART12 have unresolved subambiguities. To correct these effects, several points were removed and two clock breaks were introduced for HOBART12. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 1811 scheduled 1713 correlated (in database) 1426 recoverable (usable) 1322 used Session fit: 34.246 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12 407 201 159 39.1% HOBART26 368 285 268 72.8% KOKEE 628 542 514 81.8% MATERA 643 498 443 68.9% NYALES20 747 631 600 80.3% TIGOCONC 198 141 128 64.6% WESTFORD 631 554 532 84.3% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 1811 1426 1322 73.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0549-575 12 8 6 50.0% 0340+362 3 3 2 66.7% 1933-400 34 32 15 44.1% 0759+183 13 11 9 69.2% 1614+051 32 28 22 68.8% 1823+568 20 20 20 100.0% 0403-132 20 17 12 60.0% 1144+402 29 29 18 62.1% 1243-072 5 4 2 40.0% 2355-106 3 2 2 66.7% 0104-408 7 7 4 57.1% 0133+476 77 77 63 81.8% 0458-020 1 1 1 100.0% 0656+082 9 9 6 66.7% 0749+540 7 7 5 71.4% 0808+019 37 34 18 48.6% 1034-293 6 5 2 33.3% 1057-797 33 31 23 69.7% 1124-186 31 25 17 54.8% 1300+580 114 114 95 83.3% 1351-018 10 7 7 70.0% 1357+769 60 60 54 90.0% 1519-273 4 3 2 50.0% 1749+096 65 63 52 80.0% 1908-201 6 2 2 33.3% 1923+210 19 19 14 73.7% 3C418 123 119 101 82.1% 2052-474 12 12 10 83.3% 2113+293 14 14 9 64.3% 2255-282 10 10 6 60.0% 0648-165 4 3 2 50.0% 0912+029 15 15 9 60.0% 0920+390 1 1 1 100.0% 1324+224 78 74 62 79.5% 1846+322 10 10 5 50.0% 2127-096 3 2 1 33.3% 2227-088 35 34 30 85.7% 2319+444 6 6 4 66.7% 0019+058 20 18 16 80.0% 0215+015 67 60 48 71.6% 0529+483 46 46 36 78.3% 0536+145 48 44 20 41.7% 0716+714 137 133 120 87.6% 1040+244 101 92 67 66.3% 1053+704 24 24 20 83.3% 1306+360 6 6 6 100.0% 1520+437 18 18 17 94.4% 2059+034 31 29 23 74.2% 2214+350 33 33 21 63.6% 0115-214 3 3 0 0.0% 0322+222 59 50 32 54.2% 0537-286 6 4 2 33.3% 0920-397 3 3 1 33.3% 1015+057 18 18 16 88.9% 1759-396 9 9 9 100.0% 2008-159 22 22 19 86.4% 2300-683 24 23 16 66.7% 0016+731 125 124 96 76.8% 0308-611 3 2 0 0.0% 0332-403 25 19 18 72.0% 1657-261 15 15 6 40.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 1811 1713 1322 73.0% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12-HOBART26 157 90 77 49.0% HOBART12-KOKEE 90 60 50 55.6% HOBART12-MATERA 40 15 8 20.0% HOBART12-NYALES20 61 13 8 13.1% HOBART12-TIGOCONC 45 23 16 35.6% HOBART12-WESTFORD 14 0 DESELECTED 0.0% HOBART26-KOKEE 74 73 73 98.6% HOBART26-MATERA 37 30 28 75.7% HOBART26-NYALES20 52 49 49 94.2% HOBART26-TIGOCONC 39 35 34 87.2% HOBART26-WESTFORD 9 8 7 77.8% KOKEE-MATERA 126 93 83 65.9% KOKEE-NYALES20 161 154 151 93.8% KOKEE-TIGOCONC 24 18 17 70.8% KOKEE-WESTFORD 153 144 140 91.5% MATERA-NYALES20 228 191 172 75.4% MATERA-TIGOCONC 24 15 12 50.0% MATERA-WESTFORD 188 154 140 74.5% NYALES20-TIGOCONC 22 13 12 54.5% NYALES20-WESTFORD 223 211 208 93.3% TIGOCONC-WESTFORD 44 37 37 84.1% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 1811 1426 1322 73.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.